- CRUSADER NO REMORSE DOSBOX BLACK BACKGROUND INSTALL
- CRUSADER NO REMORSE DOSBOX BLACK BACKGROUND FULL
I think that machine's going back to being a Lakka box under my TV, but next time I'm on something relatively weak maybe I'll cycle through a couple of the BSDs to see if any of them work better for me. It felt OK to use, though, as long as I avoided the Web. Maybe I'd have had better luck with a BSD, I dunno. kinda a shitty way to be, for a multitasking operating system. Overall, Linux continues to feel like it does very poorly (in a workstation/desktop context, anyway) any time there's any contention for resources whatsoever, including just multiple things needing CPU cycles. Certainly Gnome wouldn't have worked, to pick the worst possible option (resource-use wise).
CRUSADER NO REMORSE DOSBOX BLACK BACKGROUND INSTALL
Agreed that Linux generally has never (in the 20ish years I've used it, anyway) felt high-performance, exactly, on a workstation, but Void keeps out the garbage services Linux has accumulated over the years, unless you install them yourself, so gets it to a point where it's only slightly fatter than circa 2000 Linux (kernel's grown larger, no getting around that). It's only a little fatter than Alpine, but better-suited to desktop use. I use a custom configuration of Motif (it works and does not get in the way).
The kernel and most distros suffer from kitchensinkitis. My point in saying this is: in 2014, this would have been seen as a cool project, and I'd bet some coworkers would've even encouraged me to try and get it working. Otherwise, you're glued to a browser app that sometimes breaks in browsers that aren't Chrome. GApps is interesting in that they do support standards like IMAP and CalDAV, but only if your organization allows for "insecure authentication" options, which mine does not. To get Slack out of the way: good luck the XMPP and IRC gateways were retired ages ago, and interactive API clients even today appear to be second-class citizens. Nowadays, our stack is GApps with Slack, and a heathy dose of Zoom. I at the time was using Linux with Pidgin and Evolution, there being no Microsoft clients for any of the stack. The ironic part of all this: it was Microsoft Exchange and Microsoft Lync. We also all had voice phones on our desks for very-impromptu calls. When the article was written, my workplace communicated over e-mail (IMAP-enabled), our calendars supported CalDAV, and we did have an instant messaging system that ran over extensions to SIP, which _was_ compatible with libpurple. reason for joystick is back in WIN95 day I was able to run entire game with SideWinder using just the buttons set up in crusader.cfg, was easier than keybd/mouse.It's a neat idea that, thanks to the applications-not-protocols approach taken by many platforms today, probably isn't viable any longer. I have read some info saying dosbox only emulates max 4 buttons, is that a hard limit that I just can't get past? I don't know where or why it would be rewriting or recompiling the cfg each start. As soon as I open it back up in winxp it has been rewritten. But everytime I run the game through DOSBox the crusader.cfg reverts back to the original button settings. I used the crusader.cfg of the game to edit the joystick buttons, assigning all available to me (1-4, 7, 8, and LHAT 15-18). I have also noticed something strange that may or may not be related. (if I press the other keys I get the same 1-4 actions instead) I have tried all the diff dosbox cfg settings and also tried joytokey tool. The stick is sending all the buttons to the game but the game seems to only see/act on 1-4. I've searched through the forum and haven't found a tweak to fix it yet, hope someone might have an idea.
CRUSADER NO REMORSE DOSBOX BLACK BACKGROUND FULL
I have No Regret running fine in 0.70 with everything but full button access on my joystick.
0 kommentar(er)
